Two Approaches to Similar Conflicts
The fight for educational reform is across all generations, and across many media sites yet the means of achieving this justice has different means of getting there. In the two site below the action of Education Reform is carried out through the brains of “students” (specifically college students talking about K-12 education) and a bit more mature association. Both had the same intentions and yet their means of getting there are expressed in different “plans”.
The first plan, established by the SFER (Students for Educational Reform), is meant for a younger audience, as well as written by a younger audience. The vocabulary within the site is much more digestible for students talking about issues that students have the most passion for. They talk about rights with being able to use the bathrooms that “we” choose based on the gender “we” identify with. The is hopes of changing student loan debt in present time, because that is what is at the forefront of their issues with education. Their means is to establish this “fire” within the people who are reading/ viewing the site, and hopefully get them to join the fight. Either with their own voice, the person viewing the site, or to support with a donation as little as a dollar. This site, their plan revolves around gaining voices as means to win this “battle” that surrounds the educational reform. There are two different categories under the “Why We Fight” (about) that describes this as “How We Win” as well as “When We Win”. There is a comradery force that pushes their plan into not only the reader’s mind but in a way their heart causing them to feel the same fuel that the students who created this site feel. Their whole plan revolves around the hope that those who join will be as passionate as they are, about the issues they are.
On the other side there are the more mature fight of the CER (Center for Education Reform) which takes a more sophisticated approach on similar ideas. Because they know their audience is that of a more established group, they don’t need to place that “passion” into their site because the people going to their site already have that passion within them. They talk about issues that have more of a “lasting” impact. They take a stance on issues that have been around a while, issues that may take a larger piece of the educational reform pie. Even within the About page their statement says that education isn’t the goal it is the anchor. While many of the topics they bring up about educational reform are the same as the site prior, the way the manage their “plan” is much more passive. They have this credibility about them and about their cause so they do not have to “push” the ideas so hard. Their plan is in the works and has been for a while so essentially the “proof is in the pudding”.
The thing between these two websites that caught my attention was how the attribute of establishment played into the way they went about getting others to follow what they were saying. They both have huge followings and are doing the job of creating a new meaning to the educational world and yet how they go about their plan is corralled by who knows them, and the amount of people know them.
https://www.studentsforedreform.org/why_we_fight
https://edreform.com/about/